Monthly Archive for July, 2008

NASA says Phoenix lander is sampling water on Mars

Filed under:

Yep, just like we’d heard, the Phoenix lander has identified water in a soil sample it collected in Mars earlier, and NASA’s extended the mission for another 90 days to go look for more. There’s no analysis of the ice yet, but it doesn’t look like there’s any organic materials in the sample, and it’ll take another three to four weeks before there’s any more data to reveal. Hopefully that means we’ll be packing up our silver go-go boots and taking off for our fabulous future lives on Mars in a month, but we’ll see how things go.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Treadwall is a Wall-Climbing Treadmill!

Treadwall is a Wall-Climbing Treadmill!

Click Here to View in Full Screen Mode

Check out this really cool wall-climbing treadmill called Treadwall.  Now you can experience the daily ultimate wall-climbing experience without leaving your home.

The Treadwall is designed to bring the capabilities of an entire climbing gym to the limited space of a health club, school gymnasium or personal home. The freestanding and compact design of a Treadwall allows you to blend it into your environment, with a choice of sizes to fit your facility. Exterior options are also available.

via coolest-gadgets

Brought to you by: Zedomax.com

Treadwall is a Wall-Climbing Treadmill!

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Leaf’s 56-megapixel Camera Costs More Than Your Car

Leaf
Megapixels aren’t everything, but it certainly couldn’t hurt to have
more. Leaf’s 56-megapixel AFi 10 camera subscribes to that philosophy
quite heavily.

Even cooler than its astronomical pixel count is the AFi 10’s Verto
technology, which rotates the picture for you to snap portrait shots.
This way, you can maintain stability more easily.

The AFi 10’s also equipped with a fancy 56×36mm sensor, so it shoots
medium-format pictures. Oh, yeah –  it’ll only cost you about $44,000.
What are you waiting for? Who really needs two kidneys, anyway?

Product Page
[Leaf]

56 Megapixel Leaf AFi 10 [Photography Blog via DVICE]

Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Add to digg


Winebloggin’ Episode II

[Editor's note: This is the second post in a six part series by Christopher Null detailing his experiences  producing his very own homemade vino with the aid of a high tech gadget called the WinePod.]

By Christopher Null

Continued from Winebloggin’ Episode I

Picture_17

Not surprisingly, it turns out a crazy amount of tech is required to make wine, and though the WinePod itself is a large, four-foot-tall monster (compared here next to a 5-year old), it is nothing compared to the mountain of additional boxes that come with it, stacked four-high on a wooden pallet.

I help the driver unload the truck. All the secondary gear gets stowed in the garage. We wheel the WinePod into a little alley we have next to our house. Because winemaking gives off CO2 (and lots of it), it has to be made either in a room with lots of ventilation or outside. Can you imagine the headlines if I accidentally asphyxiated my family…with wine?

I go through the boxes and can tell immediately that the "dump grapes in and push start" dream I’ve been having is nowhere close to reality. This is the most insane chemistry set you’ve ever seen. Pipettes, siphons, thermometers, hydrometers. Beakers, carboys, pumps and stoppers. A box full of cultures, acid, yeast, SO2, and powdered tannins. There’s even a bag of glass marbles. It’s all well organized but totally overwhelming, so I occupy myself with installing the WineCoach software on my laptop and making sure the WinePod actually powers up. It does.

Picture_16
Baby steps. I read through the manuals (there are four of them, and no pictures at all) and realize the best way to approach this is to go slow and steady, one day at a time. Most of this stuff isn’t needed until much later in the process. Right now I just need to prepare for the arrival of the grapes and get the WinePod ready.

The first step, as with anything you might prepare for human consumption, is to wash up. Sanitization is big with WinePod. Every other page of the manual has you cleaning something. But the WinePod weighs 120 pounds and holds 15 gallons of liquid. Cleaning the thing is a 15-step process (per the manual) which requires two people and several hours. I can’t sleep worrying about all the cleaning I have to do.

Fortunately, I have Greg Snell, CEO of WinePod’s parent company ProVina, helping me along. He says the WinePod is already sanitized and I don’t really have to clean anything until after it’s touched grapes and before it’s used again. And really: Clean doesn’t mean sterile; this isn’t open heart surgery. I clean most of the stuff in advance anyway, paranoid that germs are going to ruin the wine.

IPicture_14_2
t isn’t long before it’s time to really get going: The grapes arrive, three hefty five-gallon buckets (kind of like those big, industrial-grade paint buckets) that have to thaw before we actually start adding ingredients and begin fermenting.

Thaw? That’s right: The WinePod is calibrated and designed to use grapes that the company provides, and those grapes are provided frozen. It sounds a little counterintuitive: Freezing a wine is a great way to ruin it, so wouldn’t freezing the grapes be just as bad? I am assured repeatedly it will all turn out fine, and really there is no other way to go about it: Grape harvest is in the late fall. I am trying to start a batch of wine in July. It’s either this or grab something seedless from Safeway. Mmmmmm.

At the encouragement of WinePod management, I’m using Cabernet grapes for this batch. The company has fruit and specific instructions for both Pinot Noir and Syrah varietals, but I’m told that for a first run, Cab is the simplest and likely to give me the best results. I don’t argue, and happily haul the 150 pounds of Rancho Sarco Cabernet into the house.

The grapes have to thaw inside, which means my kitchen is now dominated by damp, plastic-wrapped buckets, much to the unending curiosity of my children and our cat. In two days it all goes into the WinePod, and that’s when the fun begins.

[to be continued]

Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Add to digg


Figuring out which NVIDIA GPUs are defective — it’s a lot

Filed under:

So now that HP’s joined Dell in releasing information on which laptops have those defective NVIDIA GPUs, we can sort of piece together which chips are faulty — and just as had been rumored, it looks like basically every Geforce 8600M and 8400M chip is affected. That’s not good news for NVIDIA, which has been saying that only “previous-generation” chips were problematic — unless the chipmaker is planning on updating the hugely popular 8×00 series sometime, say, now, that’s not exactly true, now is it? Other affected chips appear to be in the GeForce Go 7000 and 6000 lines, as well as the Quadro NVS 135M and the Quadro FX 360M, but that’s just looking at model numbers, and we can’t be exactly sure. We’d say that if you’ve got a machine with any one of these GPUs, it might be wise to call in and see what your laptop maker is going to do — and it would be smart for NVIDIA to come right out and say exactly how big and how bad this problem really is.

Read - Dell list of machines and patch
Read - HP list of machines, extended warranty info

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Dell Vostro 2510 now configurable online

Filed under:

It looks like those already sold on Dell’s slightly less business-like Vostro 2510 laptop don’t have to wait too long to get their hands on one, as the just-leaked laptop is now configurable on Dell’s website with an estimated ship time of 3 to 5 days. As we had heard, the base price starts at a reasonable $899, which includes a 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo T5670 processor, 2GB of RAM, a 160GB hard drive, and a better than usual 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS graphics card. If that’s not enough, you can push things up past the $2,000 mark pretty easily with a faster processor, a max 4GB of RAM, an Blu-ray drive, and other premium add-ons. Hit up the link below to get started.

[Via Electronista]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Alarm Clock Wakes You Up With Bacon

Wakebaconopen
In an episode of The Office, Michael Scott said he wanted to wake up to the
smell of bacon each morning. So every night before going to bed he laid
strips of bacon on the grill and set a timer for it to turn on in the
morning. One morning he stepped on the grill and cooked his foot.

Matty Sallin, Daniel Bartolini, and Hsiao-huh Hsu designed the Wake n’
Bacon alarm clock just for Michael — and all the other bacon lovers
who wish to rise and shine with the delicious aroma of melting pig fat
flowing in their nostrils. Mm-mmm.

The Wake n’ Bacon is much safer than Michael’s method. You stick a
strip of frozen bacon into its tray before you go to bed; then you set
the alarm. Ten minutes before the alarm is set to go off, the Wake n’
Bacon turns on two halogen bulbs that slowly cook the bacon.

You’d have to be really stupid to step into this thing. Then again you’d have to be pretty stupid to seriously want one of these. 

Product page [Mathlete via Geek] (Thanks, Greg!)

Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Add to digg


Team overclocks Core 2 Quad to 5.1GHz, claims world record — too bad it’s not

Filed under:

So we hate to break it to the good guys at Tom’s Hardware, but while we’re impressed that they managed to overclock a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 to 5.1GHz using a cryogenic cooling system, it’s not nearly close to the world record they’re claiming — we’ve seen P4’s at up to 8.18GHz, and just a couple months ago someone jacked a Core 2 Extreme QX9775 on a Skulltrail board to 6GHz. Still, it’s always fun to watch people pour liquid nitrogen over a mobo — video after the break.

[Via PC World]

Continue reading Team overclocks Core 2 Quad to 5.1GHz, claims world record — too bad it’s not

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Lithium-ion Phosphate Batteries Baked in a Microwave Could Lead To Cheaper Prices

Lithium_ion_batteries_2

A group at the University of Texas has come up with an inventive way to create better and possibly cheaper batteries: By bonding its ingredients in a microwave.

Professor Arumugam Manthiram of UT Austin has created lithium iron Lithium_x220_2phosphate compounds that take less time to create than its current method. Currently, lithium iron batteries use higher temperatures to create than other types, which leads to higher costs and less capable batteries for everything from laptops to electric cars.

Lithium-ion phosphate batteries are safer and ‘deliver large bursts of power’ than the lithium cobalt oxide that is used in most laptops. If they get cheaper, we could have the more improved performance we’ve been waiting for years. 

(The search for longer-lasting, cheaper batteries is often considered the modern holy grail of electronics. Wall Street Journal columnist Walt Mossberg has often said that he’d drop everything to invest in stock of the creator of the perfect battery.)

Image: 40-nanometer-wide rod-shaped particles of the lithium-ion phosphate batteries. Courtesy of Arumugam Manthiram, University of Texas at Austin.

The Austin group mixed the needed ingredients and
placed it in a microwave for five minutes, heating it to 300 °C. For
perspective, the current lithium-ion phosphate creation process is long
(hours) and hot (at 700-degrees). This pushes its overall costs beyond
those of the inferior lithium cobalt oxide, to say nothing of the
environmental problems it brings about.

But why are these better than others? Lithium-ion phosphate batteries,
once produced, are considered among the most energy efficient types
because of their ‘energy-to-weight ratios, and their slower charge loss
rate.’

While companies like A123 Systems have started to develop this type of
battery separately, Prof. Manthiram’s method is different enough that
companies have already contacted him about implementing his process into the new batches of batteries.

Source: Technologyreview.com, EDNeurope

Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Add to digg


Asus Announces Two More Atom-equipped Subnotebooks Coming Soon

Eee

Asus knows its subnotebooks are fashionable, and the company’s preparing to offer two new models of its popular Eee PC lineup.

Set for a 2008 release, the two new models, Ultimate and Pro Fashion,
will feature dual-core Intel Atom processors and expanded storage
capacities.  Asus president Jerry Shen told Digitimes that one of the
models (it’s unclear which) will have a four-to-five hour battery life
and include a 10.1-inch, 32GB solid state driven and a widescreen LED
backlit panel. This model, estimated to cost between $700 and $900, is expected to arrive September.

The Ultimate and Pro Fashion will be Asus’s fourth and fifth
subnotebook models featuring Inte’s power-efficient Atom processors designed specially for smaller devices.
The Eee PC 901 introduced in June 2008 was Asus’s first notebook to use this
chip.

Asustek preps launch of Ultimate and Pro Fashion Eee PCs; prices to hit US$700 or more [Digitimes] (Thanks, Dylan!)

(Photo credit: Axel Buhrman/Flickr )

   
   
Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Add to digg